Saturday, September 20, 2008

Crime and Punishment or THAT'S NOT FAIR!!!

My, My how time doth fly. I suddenly realized that it has been a couple of weeks since I posted here. My sincerest regrets to you dear readers.

Last post, the buck was passed and it stopped at the serpent. God asked why they hid, how they knew they were naked, and who told them. Adam blamed Woman for giving him the fruit and God for giving him the woman. Woman blamed the serpent for deceiving her into eating. And now, God turns His attention to the subtil serpent as we pick up where we left off.

And the LORD God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life: The serpent, because he decieved Woman and brought about the entrance of sin, death, and seperation from God into this world, receives his punishment. This curse has not ended, serpents everywhere still crawl upon their bellies in the dust.

And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel. This part of the punishment was a prophecy intended to bring hope to mankind and was addressed to THAT serpent we know as the Devil a murderer and the father of lies (Revelation 20:2; John 8:44). Some have suggested that the enmity was only between Woman and the serpent, yet I would to ask them, "Are not men a part of that seed?" Regardless, we know that the seed referred to here is Jesus as is referenced by the third person singular pronoun in the latter part of the last phrase, and He had no earthly father to sire Him (Matthew 1:18-25; Galatians 4:4; I John 3:8).

Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.
Now He turns to the second part of the equation that brought sin, death, and seperation from God into this once pleasing earth - Woman. The curse of Woman is in three parts. 1.) greater sorrow and children; 2.) greater sorrow in children; and 3.) desire towards and subjection to her husband. Notice in our discussion of Genesis 2:20-24 that Woman was created from man for the purpose of being a suitible helper. As such she was equal in standing with man (bone of my bone and flesh of my flesh). Because she listened to and followed her desire instead of ruling it, God put that desire under the rule of man. Because she tempted man to sin by offering the fruit, she was and is subjected to man. Paul reiterates this point in I Timothy 2:11-15, I Corinthians 11:7-12 and Ephesians 5. Notice too, that it is God, not man, that places Woman in that position.

And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life; God now turns to the third party in this deed - Adam. Adam stands accused of two sins: 1.) Obeying his wife instead of God, and 2.) Breaking the commandment of God. Because of man's sin, man must face the consequences. One consequence is that of death (Romans 5:12) which is a direct result of disobedience to God's commands. As for the other, God pronounces a curse upon the ground. Man would not be allowed to enjoy the fruits of God's labour (the garden) but must earn them through labor/worry/toil/sorrow (itstsabone - translated here as sorrow) throughout the whole of his life.

Thorns also and thistles shall it bring forth to thee; and thou shalt eat the herb of the field; The ground would yield thorns and thistles as Adam toiled and instead of the garden with its fruits, Adam would have to eat of the fruit of the field.

In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return. God wanted Adam to realize the extent of the damage that his sin caused and therefore explained it to him. Adam now would be required to work and not just any work - TOIL (i.e. work hard). "Adam, you will eat the product of your sweat (meaning hard work) until the day you die and return to dust for you were made from dust. Because you are from dust, you will return to dust."

God, it seems, always starts at the begining. :) He began the Bible at the begining of this universe to answer where we came from. He began at the begining of sin with the one that instigated it. Satan had begun the incident with a lie, Woman had perpetuated it with desire, Adam had finalized it with disobedience. Satan's tool was cursed, Satan was punished, Woman was punished, Adam's livelihood was cursed, Adam was punished. Woman-kind suffers sorrow and subjection as a result of Woman's sin. Man-kind suffers death and toil as a result of Adam's sin. And the earth was forever marred.

Christian

7 comments:

deboraw said...

Christian, Consider: Rom 8:18 For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed to us-ward.
Rom 8:19 For the earnest expectation of the creation waiteth for the revealing of the sons of God.
Rom 8:20 For the creation was subjected to vanity, not of its own will, but by reason of him who subjected it, in hope
Rom 8:21 that the creation itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the liberty of the glory of the children of God.
Rom 8:22 For we know that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now.

Anonymous said...

I agree that the God's statement about enmity between the serpent and his seed and the woman and her seed is a prophecy about Christ.

I have sometimes wondered what went on in Adam's mind. Why did he eat of the fruit that his wife gave him? Paul said in 1 Timothy 2:14 that Eve was deceived, but Adam wasn't. He must have known that the serpent was lying when he said, "you shall not surely die". So why did Adam eat the fruit anyway? The only thing I can think of is that his concern for Eve was part of his decision somehow. In other words, here was this woman that he must have loved very deeply. She was the only creature that was a suitable helper for him. And Adam knew she had already eaten the fruit of which God has said, if you eat of it you will die! So since Adam was not deceived, he must have known that this woman he loved was doomed! How that knowledge may have led him to also eat of the fruit I can only speculate.

Christian said...

Dear Deboraw and Author,

First, thank you for your comments.

Deboraw, that passage certainly affirms the statement "And the earth was forever marred." doesn't it.

Author, fine comment. I obviously don't know if you are married. If you are, you can attest to the fact that we are guilty at times of eating the food placed in front of us without even thinking about it. Yet even then I don't believe that was the case. For, when God was handing down Adam's punishment, He said "Because you hearkened unto the voice of thy wife. . . ." Adam was definitely not decieved, he was convinced. By someone he loved no less. Was it simply a case of peer pressure? Was it because he trusted the helper God had given him? We will only know that he was convince to trust Woman instead of obeying God.

Christian

deboraw said...

Christian, Yes, the passage in Rom. does seem to underscore that fact. Also, in regard to the other comment, I have heard people make the statement, "I see what the gospel says, but my wife (or mother, or someone else they loved) didn't obey the gospel and I want to go where they went to be with them when I die." Of course they have missed several points in that line of reasoning, but it seems to be made in innocence, because they don't have a real good handle on what they are saying, even though they have the facts. Maybe? Deboraw

Christian said...

Dear Deboraw,

Two points come to mind in considering your question.

1.) There is a difference between innocence and refusing to accept the facts based on one's feelings. Hence the many doctrines in the religious world that are based solely upon one's feelings. (ie Well he was a good person and so I just don't believe that a God of love would send him to hell).

2.) There is a big difference between innocence and pure stupidity. Paul illustrates this point very clearly in Acts 17:22-32 when explaining the end of innocence to the Stoics and Epicureans and philosphers on Mars Hill. They were innocent. The account of the rich man and Lazarus (Luke 16:19-31) also illustrates it when Abraham tells the rich man that if they would not hear the prophets they derserved what they got (I paraphrase obviously).

Final point: If the many doctrines based upon feelings were correct, why would Jesus say "I am the Way the Truth and the Light, No man cometh unto the Father but through Me." (John 14:6) and "Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.
And a man's foes shall be they of his own household. He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me." (Matthew 10:34-37)?

Food for thought.

Christian

Anonymous said...

It would appear to me that those mentioned in these comments are lacking in two areas. First it indicates a lack of understanding of the word of God. Secondly it shows a significant lack of trust in God. by this I mean that they will not trust that God means what He says. Either area will send one to the place no one really believes in or wants to go. The seriousness of the situation will only be realized too late.

Christian said...

Dear Raul,

Thank you for that fine comment. You hit the proverbial nail right on its head :).

Christian